{"id":42,"date":"2024-05-18T20:56:00","date_gmt":"2024-05-18T20:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tumgercekler.net\/index.php\/2024\/05\/18\/2024-05-uye-hakim-tamer-keskin-ihsas-rey-yapms\/"},"modified":"2024-05-18T20:56:00","modified_gmt":"2024-05-18T20:56:00","slug":"2024-05-uye-hakim-tamer-keskin-ihsas-rey-yapms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/2024\/05\/18\/2024-05-uye-hakim-tamer-keskin-ihsas-rey-yapms\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00dcye Hakim Tamer Keskin \u0130hsas-\u0131 Rey Yapm\u0131\u015f Ve Taraf\u0131n\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a Belli Etmi\u015ftir"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/div>\n

Adnan Oktar ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda \u0130stanbul 30. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f olan 2021\/6 karar numaral\u0131 karar\u0131n \u00fczerine verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm istinaf edilmi\u015f ve Adnan Oktar ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki dava dosyas\u0131, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi’nde 1,5 y\u0131l s\u00fcren de\u011ferlendirmenin ard\u0131ndan yerel mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f olan h\u00fck\u00fcm, 400 sayfal\u0131k gerek\u00e7eli karar ile 708 cihetten bozulmu\u015f;<\/strong> ancak bunun \u00fczerine cumhuriyet tarihinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f bir medya ter\u00f6r\u00fc sonucunda istinaf hakimleri, savc\u0131lar, hatta bakan yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ktan tehdit edilmeleri ile, verilen karar, 40 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lan g\u00f6stermelik bir de\u011ferlendirme <\/strong>ile \u00fcst mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan “esastan” bozulmu\u015f, BAM 1.CD hakimleri g\u00f6rev yerlerinden al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve hatta haklar\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Adnan Oktar ve arkada\u015flar\u0131na nas\u0131l bir KUMPAS UYGULANDI\u011eINI, hukuk sistemine TEHD\u0130T MEKAN\u0130ZMASININ NASIL DAH\u0130L ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 ve HAKKAN\u0130YETL\u0130 KARARLARIN NASIL PERVASIZCA DURDURULAB\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130<\/strong> g\u00f6zler \u00f6n\u00fcne seren bu hukuk ter\u00f6r\u00fc<\/strong> sonras\u0131nda g\u00f6stermelik bir yarg\u0131lama ile ilk yerel mahkeme karar\u0131 aynen tekrar edilmi\u015f ve bu hukuksuz karar, g\u00f6reve yeni ve \u00f6zel olarak getirilen <\/strong>BAM 1CD hakimleri taraf\u0131ndan da -itirazlar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi \u00fcst\u00fcnk\u00f6r\u00fc bir kararla- alelacele onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bu kurgunun nas\u0131l i\u015fledi\u011fi g\u00f6zler \u00f6n\u00fcndedir. Ancak konu hakk\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za \u00e7\u0131kan bir geli\u015fme, \u00f6zel bir plan kurulmu\u015f oldu\u011funa dair net delil niteli\u011findedir ve dosyan\u0131n mutlaka bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmektedir.<\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi \u00fcyesi TAMER KESK\u0130N<\/strong> (37950) huzurdaki davan\u0131n 12.04.2023 tarihli istinaf incelemesine kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve oy kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Ancak hakim Tamer Keskin, bu istinaf karar\u0131na imza atmas\u0131ndan 6 ay \u00f6nce ayn\u0131 DOSYADA \u201cTANIK\u201d SIFATIYLA D\u0130NLENM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R. <\/strong>Huzurdaki davan\u0131n 15.03.2022 tarihli ilk istinaf incelemesini yapan (ve ilk derece mahkemesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 bozan) daire ba\u015fkan ve \u00fcyeleri hakk\u0131ndaki HSK soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda, Tamer Keskin, 06.10.2022 tarihinde \u201ctan\u0131k\u201d s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifade vermi\u015ftir. Bu ifade, HSK m\u00fcfetti\u015fleri taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan raporda yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Raporun 268. Sayfas\u0131nda yer alan Tamer Keskin’e ait ifadeler \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026 Yarg\u0131lanan grubun \u00d6RG\u00dcT OLDU\u011eU B\u0130L\u0130NEN<\/strong> bir yap\u0131 oldu\u011fu\u2026\u201d,<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026 Dairenin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir dosya, bu y\u00fczden g\u00f6revsizlik verilmesi gerekti\u011fi\u201d,<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026 Adnan Oktar dosyas\u0131n\u0131n dairenin i\u015flerini aksataca\u011f\u0131 ve d\u00fczenini bozaca\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in bu dosyan\u0131n ESASTAN REDDED\u0130LMES\u0130 GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130<\/strong>, bunu Ba\u015fkan Reyhan YAMAN\u2019a s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak bildirdi\u011fini \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc dosya e\u011fer a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131rsa en az 1 y\u0131l s\u00fcre alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, fakat Reyhan YAMAN\u2019\u0131n bu konu\u015fmaya cevap vermedi\u011fini, Reyhan YAMAN\u2019\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesini belli etmedi\u011fini\u2026\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026 Karar verilinceye kadar da RED karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve bunu dillendirdi\u011fini\u2026\u201d<\/strong><\/em> beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Dosyadaki bozma ve beraat karar\u0131ndan sonra ise \u015fu beyanlarda ve iddialarda bulunmu\u015f ve hatta DOSYANIN YEN\u0130 KARARINDA \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK\u0130 OLACA\u011eINI B\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 HALDE<\/strong> reyini dillendirmekten imtina etmemi\u015ftir. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026Verilen bozma ve beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00c7OK K\u00d6T\u00dc B\u0130R KARAR OLDU\u011eUNU<\/strong>\u2026\u201d,<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026AHLAKSIZ B\u0130R SANIK AVUKATININ B\u0130LE B\u00d6YLE B\u0130R BOZMA VE BERAAT YAZAMAYACA\u011eINI<\/strong>\u2026\u201d,<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026 Verilen BOZMA KARARINA \u00c7OK \u00dcZ\u00dcLD\u00dc\u011e\u00dcN\u00dc<\/strong>\u2026\u201d,<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026Bu kadar \u00e7ok tahliye olmaz<\/strong>, ancak tutukluluk s\u00fcresi dolarsa tahliye verilebilece\u011fini, bunu da Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u2026\u201d<\/em> beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n \u201cHakimin Davaya Bakamayaca\u011f\u0131 Haller\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 22\u2019nci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (h) bendine g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n

\u201cMADDE 22-(1) Hakim; \u2026 h) Ayn\u0131 davada TANIK veya bilirki\u015fi s\u0131fat\u0131yla dinlenmi\u015fse, hakimlik g\u00f6revi yapamaz.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

T\u00fcm bunlara ra\u011fmen, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi \u00fcyesi TAMER KESK\u0130N (37950) huzurdaki davan\u0131n 12.04.2023 tarihli istinaf incelemesine kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve oy kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tamer Keskin\u2019in ad\u0131, sicil numaras\u0131 ve imzas\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu istinaf karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yer almaktad\u0131r. Buna dair g\u00f6rsel a\u015fa\u011f\u0131dad\u0131r:<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/div>\n

Oyu ba\u015ftan belli olan, bunu da tan\u0131kl\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dile getirmi\u015f olan bir ki\u015finin, huzurdaki dosya hakk\u0131nda karar yetkisine sahip bir hakim olarak g\u00f6rev YAPAMAYACA\u011eI<\/strong> kanun ile a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Huzurdaki dosyaya ili\u015fkin istinaf hakimlerine y\u00f6nelik HSK soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda, 2022 y\u0131l\u0131nda tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla dinlenmi\u015f olan Tamer Keskin\u2019in, CMK m. 22\/1-h amir h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca, 2023 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki istinaf karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmamas\u0131 gerekmektedir<\/strong>. Bu durum kanunla engellenmi\u015ftir. Bu konuda Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026Ceza Genel Kurulu\u2019nun 23.10.2001 g\u00fcn ve 9MD-229\/230 Say\u0131l\u0131 ve 03.12.2002 g\u00fcn ve 4MD-291\/422 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda da, ayn\u0131 davada soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma a\u015famalar\u0131nda tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmi\u015f bulunanlar\u0131n o davada hakimlik yapmalar\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama y\u00f6ntemine KES\u0130N B\u0130\u00c7\u0130MDE AYKIRILIK OLU\u015eTURDU\u011eU<\/strong> ve bu halin MUTLAK BOZMA NEDEN\u0130 OLDU\u011eU<\/strong> vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130ncelemeye konu olayda karar\u0131 veren hakimin taraflarca tan\u0131k olarak g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, mahkeme hakiminin ayn\u0131 zamanda olay\u0131n tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 olmas\u0131 sebebiyle HAK\u0130ML\u0130K G\u00d6REV\u0130N\u0130 YAPAMAYACA\u011eI HALDE YARGILAMAYA KATILARAK, H\u00dcK\u00dcM KURULMASI<\/strong> suretiyle CMK\u2019n\u0131n 22\/1-h maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131\u2026 H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130N BOZULMASINA\u2026\u201d <\/em>(Yarg\u0131tay 18. Ceza Dairesi 2015\/19505 E. 2017\/345 K. 11\/01\/2017 T.)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Huzurdaki davada hakimlik g\u00f6revini yapmaktan CMK m. 22\/1-h h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince yasaklanm\u0131\u015f olan Tamer Keskin\u2019in 12.04.2023 tarihli karara kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 289\/1-b<\/strong> maddesinde g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f olan HUKUKA KES\u0130N AYKIRILIK<\/strong> ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Yasan\u0131n huzurdaki dava bak\u0131m\u0131ndan hakimlikten menetti\u011fi Tamer Keskin\u2019in kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131yla olu\u015fan daire heyeti de \u201cKANUNA UYGUN OLARAK TE\u015eEKK\u00dcL ETMEM\u0130\u015e<\/strong>\u201d hale d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu da CMK m. 289\/1-a<\/strong> anlam\u0131nda HUKUKA KES\u0130N AYKIRILIKTIR<\/strong> VE BOZMA NEDEN\u0130D\u0130R. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Di\u011fer yandan, Tamer Keskin\u2019in 2022 y\u0131l\u0131nda vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu tan\u0131k ifadesine bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda, huzurdaki dosyan\u0131n ilk istinaf incelemesini yapan hakimleri, DAVANIN SANIKLARI ALEYH\u0130NE SONU\u00c7 DO\u011eURACAK B\u0130R KARAR VERMELER\u0130 Y\u00d6N\u00dcNDE ETK\u0130LEMEYE te\u015febb\u00fcs etti\u011fini<\/strong> ve TCK m. 277 anlam\u0131nda su\u00e7 te\u015fkil eden bu kanunsuz eylemini de \u0130FADES\u0130NDE \u0130T\u0130RAF ETT\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 <\/strong>g\u00f6rmekteyiz.<\/p>\n

Tamer Keskin\u2019in bu konudaki itiraf\u0131, HSK raporunun 269\u2019uncu sayfas\u0131nda \u015f\u00f6yle aktar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n

\u201c(Tamer Keskin) Dairenin i\u015flerini aksataca\u011f\u0131 ve d\u00fczenini bozaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle Adnan Oktar Dosyas\u0131 1. Ceza Dairesi\u2019ne geldi\u011finde Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Reyhan Yaman\u2019a s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen DOSYANIN ESASTAN REDDED\u0130LMES\u0130 GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130<\/strong> d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde oldu\u011funu bildirdi\u011fini, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc Daire\u2019de bu dosya ile ilgili duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131lsa, 1 y\u0131ldan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrmez dedi\u011fini, bunun \u00fczerine Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Reyhan Yaman\u2019\u0131n cevap vermedi\u011fini\u2026\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi, Tamer Keskin 06.10.2022 tarihli tan\u0131k beyan\u0131nda, huzurdaki dosyan\u0131n daha kapa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bile a\u00e7madan \u201cDOSYANIN ESASTAN REDDED\u0130LMES\u0130 GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcNCES\u0130NDE OLDU\u011eUNU\u201d<\/strong> Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019na iletti\u011fini itiraf etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Dahas\u0131, esastan ret d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesini de, Daire\u2019nin i\u015flerinin aksamamas\u0131 ve Daire\u2019nin d\u00fczeninin bozulmamas\u0131 ad\u0131na talep etti\u011fini belirtmektedir. Tamer Keskin\u2019e g\u00f6re, \u00f6n\u00fcndeki ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z olmas\u0131n\u0131n zerre kadar \u00f6nemi yoktur.<\/strong><\/p>\n

T\u00fcm olaylara bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda, Tamer Keskin’in a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde tan\u0131kl\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ihsas-\u0131 rey yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 duruma dair kronolojik ak\u0131\u015f \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130stanbul BAM 1. Ceza Dairesi\u2019ne geli\u015fi (Nisan 2021)<\/em><\/li>\n
  2. Tamer Keskin\u2019in \u201cbu dosyada esastan red verelim\u201d telkini (Nisan 2021)<\/em><\/li>\n
  3. Tamer Keskin\u2019in bu beyan\u0131n\u0131 itiraf\u0131 (Ekim 2022)<\/em><\/li>\n
  4. Tamer Keskin\u2019in bu dosyada esastan red karar\u0131 vermesi (Nisan 2023)<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Tamer Keskin\u2019in dava hakk\u0131ndaki fikrini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmesi ve 06.10.2022 tarihinde bu konuda tan\u0131kl\u0131k etmesinin ard\u0131ndan, ayn\u0131 dava hakk\u0131nda 12.04.2023 tarihinde karar metnine hakim olarak imza atm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131k \u015fekilde ihsas-\u0131 reydir ve kesin olarak bozma sebebidir. <\/strong><\/p>\n

    Tamer Keskin\u2019in yasay\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yok sayarak 12.04.2023 tarihli istinaf incelemesine i\u015ftirak etmesiyle CMK m. 289\/1-b h\u00fckm\u00fc ikinci kere ihlal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

    Burada t\u00fcm bu kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra \u00f6nemle \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gereken husus; \u00fcye h\u00e2kim Tamer Keskin\u2019in ayn\u0131 m\u00fcfetti\u015f raporuna g\u00f6re, verilen bozma ve beraat karar\u0131nda imzas\u0131 olmamas\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla DOSYAYI \u0130NCELEMEDEN, B\u0130LMEDEN, B\u0130LG\u0130 SAH\u0130B\u0130 OLMADAN KANAATLER\u0130N\u0130 ETRAFINA ANLATMI\u015e OLMASIDIR. <\/strong>Bu haliyle Tamer Keskin, DOSYA HAKKINDA H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R B\u0130LG\u0130S\u0130 OLMAMASINA RA\u011eMEN, dosyada YETK\u0130L\u0130 HAK\u0130M OLMAMASINA RA\u011eMEN, dosyaya esastan ret verilmesi ve Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekti\u011fi fikrini dosyaya bakan heyete dikte etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/strong> T\u00fcm bunlar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ilgili hakim, ikinci a\u015famada, kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen 645 klas\u00f6rl\u00fck dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131, 40 G\u00dcNDE \u0130NCELED\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 (!) \u0130DD\u0130A EDEREK, BA\u015eINDAN BER\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcND\u00dc\u011e\u00dc ESASTAN RET KARARINA \u0130MZA ATMI\u015eTIR.<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \u015eunu da belirtmek gerekir ki, s\u00f6z konusu hakimin, \u00fcyesi bulundu\u011fu dairenin ba\u015fkan\u0131na su\u00e7lamalarda bulunmu\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n temel nedenlerinden biri de \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 DA\u0130REYE BA\u015eKAN OLMAK \u0130STEMES\u0130D\u0130R.<\/strong> Bu talebi 09.11.2022 tarihli tan\u0131k beyan\u0131nda, d\u00f6nemin \u0130stanbul Anadolu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yle dile getirmi\u015ftir, \u201c\u2026TAMER KESK\u0130N<\/strong> benden kendisine, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi\u2019ne REYHAN YAMAN\u2019IN YER\u0130NE BA\u015eKAN OLARAK ATANMASI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N REFERANS OLMAMI \u0130STED\u0130<\/strong> ancak ben kendisini tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131m i\u00e7in b\u00f6yle bir giri\u015fimde bulunmad\u0131m\u2026”<\/em> demi\u015ftir. (HSK Raporu, Sayfa 257, Ek: 7\/147-148)<\/p>\n

    Buradan \u015fu izlenim de ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r; Tamer Keskin, zaten dairesinin ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131 egale edip yerine ge\u00e7mek istemektedir. Ancak bu iste\u011fi ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyince, \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen haz\u0131r f\u0131rsat\u0131 de\u011ferlendirerek, Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131 bir karar\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fcleyip prim kazanmak istemi\u015f gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcnmektedir. Bu \u00f6nemli bir ayr\u0131nt\u0131 olup, hakim Tamer Keskin\u2019in hareketlerindeki motivasyonun ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131nda ayd\u0131nlat\u0131c\u0131 bir g\u00f6stergedir. <\/strong><\/p>\n

    Tamer Keskin’in, \u00fcyesi bulundu\u011fu daireyle ilgili iddialar\u0131nda tamamen tutars\u0131z oldu\u011funu da belirtmek gerekmektedir. Tamer Keskin, BAM 1.CD’nde, duru\u015fmal\u0131 veya duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak bozma karar\u0131na m\u00fcracaat edilmedi\u011fini<\/strong> iddia etmi\u015ftir. Halbuki HSK m\u00fcfetti\u015flerince \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan daire karar neticelerine bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda[1]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a>, dairenin HER 5 KARARINDAN 1\u2019\u0130N\u0130N BOZMA VE\/VEYA BERAAT Y\u00d6N\u00dcNDE OLDU\u011eU ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/strong><\/p>\n

    Bu \u00e7ok y\u00fcksek bir orand\u0131r. Yani h\u00e2kim Tamer Keskin’in bilgisi ve iddias\u0131n\u0131n aksine, ilgili daire bozma y\u00f6nl\u00fc kararlar\u0131n\u0131 hayli y\u00fcksek tutmu\u015ftur. Ayr\u0131ca bir mahkeme hakkaniyete g\u00f6re karar vermekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/strong> “Bu daireden hi\u00e7bir zaman bozma karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmaz” \u015feklindeki bir a\u00e7\u0131klama, bunu s\u00f6yleyen hakimin tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yitirdi\u011fine, hakkaniyete ve adalete g\u00f6re karar vermedi\u011fine kesin bir delildir ki mevcut durumumuzda da hal b\u00f6yledir. <\/strong><\/p>\n

    Sonu\u00e7 olarak, \u00fcye hakim Tamer Keskin, huzurdaki dava konusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ihsas-\u0131 rey yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, <\/strong>t\u00fcm\u00fcyle tarafl\u0131 oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131k etti\u011finden<\/strong>, daha \u00f6nce tan\u0131kl\u0131k yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu bir davada sonras\u0131nda hakimlik g\u00f6revi \u00fcstlenerek a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etti\u011finden,<\/strong> huzurdaki dosyayla ilgili d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerini ve \u00f6nyarg\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131, dosyay\u0131 incelemeksizin daire hakimlerine anlatm\u0131\u015f ve onlar\u0131 y\u00f6nlendirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131ndan<\/strong>, ard\u0131ndan kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak \u00f6n\u00fcne gelmi\u015f bulunan, a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a husumetli oldu\u011fu huzurdaki dosyay\u0131 tek sat\u0131r dahi incelemeden (40 g\u00fcnde 645 klas\u00f6r incelenemez), ilk derece mahkemesinin gerek\u00e7esini kopyala\/yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r yapmak suretiyle aleyhe karar veren Tamer Keskin<\/strong>, A\u00c7IK\u00c7A SU\u00c7 \u0130\u015eLEM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R<\/strong>. 2021 y\u0131l\u0131nda, dosyay\u0131 hi\u00e7 incelemeden, dosyan\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay’a gitmesi gerekti\u011fini belirten Tamer Keskin, 2023 y\u0131l\u0131nda, t\u00fcm kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klara ra\u011fmen \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen bu dosyay\u0131, tam da planlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, kapa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 dahi a\u00e7madan Yarg\u0131tay’a g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir. <\/strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    [1]<\/a> \u0130lgili HSK raporu sf. 480-481<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Adnan Oktar ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda \u0130stanbul 30. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f olan 2021\/6 karar numaral\u0131 karar\u0131n \u00fczerine verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm istinaf edilmi\u015f ve Adnan Oktar ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki dava dosyas\u0131, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi’nde 1,5 y\u0131l s\u00fcren de\u011ferlendirmenin ard\u0131ndan […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[102],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-kumpas-davasi"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}