{"id":24,"date":"2024-11-26T13:23:00","date_gmt":"2024-11-26T13:23:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tumgercekler.net\/index.php\/2024\/11\/26\/2024-11-istanbul-bam-1-ceza-dairesi-baskan-ve\/"},"modified":"2024-11-26T13:23:00","modified_gmt":"2024-11-26T13:23:00","slug":"2024-11-istanbul-bam-1-ceza-dairesi-baskan-ve","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/2024\/11\/26\/2024-11-istanbul-bam-1-ceza-dairesi-baskan-ve\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0130stanbul Bam 1 Ceza Dairesi Ba\u015fkan Ve \u00dcyelerinin Yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Haberlere M\u00fcvekkil Adnan Oktar\u2019tan Tekziptir"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n

\n
<\/a><\/div>\n<\/h4>\n

\u0130ST\u0130NAF MAHKEMES\u0130 BOZMA KARARINI 14 AY BOYUNCA DOSYAYI \u0130NCELEY\u0130P, TEK TEK KANUNLARLA ve YARGITAY \u0130\u00c7T\u0130HATLARIYLA DEL\u0130LLEND\u0130REREK VERM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R<\/strong><\/h4>\n

<\/p>\n

-1. B\u00f6l\u00fcm-<\/strong><\/div>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

M\u00fcvekkil Adnan Oktar ve di\u011fer yarg\u0131lananlar hakk\u0131nda yerel mahkemenin vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu hukuksuz ceza kararlar\u0131n\u0131 hukuki ve kanuni gerek\u00e7elerle bozan \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi Hakimlerinin s\u0131rf hukukun gere\u011fini yapt\u0131klar\u0131 i\u00e7in su\u00e7lu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmalar\u0131 kanaatimizce bir hukuk devletinde asla ya\u015fanmamas\u0131 gereken olaylardan biridir. Baz\u0131 bas\u0131n\u0131n da E\u011e\u0130T\u0130ML\u0130, TECR\u00dcBEL\u0130, B\u0130LG\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130K\u0130M\u0130 OLAN, DEVLET\u0130N \u00d6ZENLE YET\u0130\u015eT\u0130RD\u0130\u011e\u0130, HAK EDEREK OLDUKLARI KONUMA GELEN Y\u00dcKSEK MAHKEME HAK\u0130MLER\u0130N\u0130N YAPTIKLARI SAVUNMAYI VE ORTAYA KOYDUKLARI HUKUK\u0130 GEREK\u00c7ELER\u0130 DE\u011e\u0130L DE,<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  • Hakk\u0131nda halen devam eden nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k davas\u0131 olan, <\/strong><\/li>\n
  • Yalan s\u00f6ylemeyi al\u0131\u015fkanl\u0131k haline getirmi\u015f, <\/strong><\/li>\n
  • Hemen her davaya bir \u015fekilde kat\u0131l\u0131p ba\u015ftan sona ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 beyan vermesiyle \u00fcn kazanm\u0131\u015f,<\/strong><\/li>\n
  • Ana davada verdi\u011fi beyanda y\u00fczlerce yalan\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015f, <\/strong><\/li>\n
  • Kendi \u00f6z k\u0131z\u0131n\u0131 cinsel istismar iftiras\u0131 i\u00e7in kullanan ve sonras\u0131nda da k\u0131z\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zde ma\u011fduriyet ve deh\u015fet hakk\u0131nda tek bir c\u00fcmle bile kurmayan,<\/strong><\/li>\n
  • Devletin hakimlerini, savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131, b\u00fcrokratlar\u0131n\u0131, bakanlar\u0131n\u0131 hemen her f\u0131rsatta alenen tehdit eden, <\/strong><\/li>\n
  • \u00dc\u00e7 laf\u0131ndan ikisi yalan, iftira, tehdit ya da kendince hakaret ve karalama gayreti i\u00e7eren…<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    m\u00fcvekkile kar\u015f\u0131 \u015fiddetli husumetiyle bilinen birka\u00e7 ki\u015fiyi esas al\u0131p, onlar\u0131n ak\u0131l d\u0131\u015f\u0131 s\u00f6zlerini man\u015fetlere ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 ve metafizik bir durumdur. <\/strong><\/p>\n

    \u0130stinaf 1. Ceza Dairesi YEREL MAHKEMEN\u0130N 711 H\u00dcKM\u00dcN\u00dc \u0130NCELEM\u0130\u015e, BUNLARDAN SADECE VE SADECE 3 TANES\u0130N\u0130 \u0130SABETL\u0130 BULMU\u015eTUR.<\/strong> Aleyhine isnat bulunmayan veya bulunup da istinaf\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan 58 h\u00fckme dokunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kalan 650 h\u00fckm\u00fcn tamam\u0131n\u0131 bozmu\u015ftur. \u00d6zel olu\u015fturulmu\u015f yerel mahkeme heyetinin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin %91’inin bozuldu\u011funu ortaya koyan bu tablo bile ne kadar adaletsiz bir yarg\u0131lama yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispata yeterlidir.<\/strong> \u0130stinaf\u0131n BOZDU\u011eU 650 H\u00dcKM\u00dcN YAKLA\u015eIK YARISI “BERAAT VER\u0130LMES\u0130 GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130” GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130NE,<\/strong> di\u011fer yar\u0131s\u0131 da “eksik soru\u015fturma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esine dayal\u0131d\u0131r. YEREL MAHKEMEN\u0130N H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R KANUN\u0130 GEREK\u00c7E SUNMADI\u011eI VE AFAK\u0130 YORUMLARA DAYALI YAZDI\u011eI \u201cGEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 KARARININ\u201d AKS\u0130NE, BOZDU\u011eU H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130N TAMAMI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N DE KANUNLARLA VE YARGITAY \u0130\u00c7T\u0130HATLARIYLA HUKUK\u0130 GEREK\u00c7ELER\u0130N\u0130 SIRALAMI\u015eTIR. <\/strong><\/p>\n

    Ancak \u0130stinaf\u2019\u0131n bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan \u00f6zel olarak olu\u015fturulan \u201chakimleri lin\u00e7 ortam\u0131\u201d, bizzat d\u00f6nemin Adalet Bakan\u0131 Bekir Bozda\u011f\u2019\u0131n kamuoyu \u00f6n\u00fcnde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7lay\u0131c\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131yla birlikte hakimlerin hukuksuz yere g\u00f6revlerinden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131, yerlerine ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131na bakan 27. Ceza Daire\u2019sinden \u00f6zel hakimler getirilmesi gibi hukukun ayaklar alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ortamda geli\u015fmi\u015ftir. DOSYANIN YEN\u0130DEN G\u00d6R\u00dcLMEK \u00dcZERE GER\u0130 G\u00d6NDER\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 YEREL MAHKEME \u0130SE KANUNLARI H\u0130\u00c7E SAYARAK, HATTA \u0130ST\u0130NAF\u2019IN \u201cEKS\u0130K \u0130\u015eLEM YAPILMI\u015e\u201d TESP\u0130T\u0130NDE BULUNDU\u011eU 13 OLAY HAKKINDA BU EKS\u0130KLER\u0130 TAMAMLAMAK ADINA H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R \u0130\u015eLEM YAPMA GERE\u011e\u0130 B\u0130LE G\u00d6RMEDEN \u0130ST\u0130NAFIN BOZMA KARARI YOKMU\u015e G\u0130B\u0130 DAVRANMI\u015eTIR.<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun “D\u0130RENME YASA\u011eI”<\/strong> ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 284. maddesinde “B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARAR VE H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130NE KAR\u015eI D\u0130REN\u0130LEMEZ VE BUNLARA KAR\u015eI HERHANG\u0130 B\u0130R KANUN YOLUNA G\u0130D\u0130LEMEZ<\/u><\/strong>” h\u00fckm\u00fc bildirilmektedir. Yeniden yarg\u0131laman\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yerel mahkeme BU A\u00c7IK KANUNU T\u00dcM T\u00dcRK\u0130YE\u2019N\u0130N G\u00d6Z\u00dc \u00d6N\u00dcNDE \u00c7\u0130\u011eNENEREK <\/strong>m\u00fcvekkil Adnan Oktar\u2019a yeniden 8 bin y\u0131ll\u0131k cezalar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

    YARGITAY 1 CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 DE BU HUKUK GARABET\u0130N\u0130 D\u00dcZELTMES\u0130 GEREK\u0130RKEN, EN AZINDAN EKS\u0130K YAPILMI\u015e \u0130\u015eLEMLER\u0130N TAMAMLANMASINI \u0130STEMES\u0130 GEREK\u0130RKEN, <\/strong>KEND\u0130 DA\u0130RES\u0130N\u0130N DAHA \u00d6NCE VERM\u0130\u015e OLDU\u011eU EMSAL KARARLARLA \u00c7EL\u0130\u015eMEY\u0130 G\u00d6ZE ALARAK, YEREL MAHKEMEN\u0130N 711 KARARININ 711\u2019\u0130NDE DE B\u0130R TANE DAH\u0130 USULS\u00dcZL\u00dcK VE HUKUKSUZLUK BULUNMADI\u011eI G\u0130B\u0130 OLA\u011eAN DI\u015eI B\u0130R YAKLA\u015eIMDA BULUNARAK<\/strong> CEZA KARARINI HUKUKSA AYKIRI OLARAK ONAMI\u015eTIR. <\/strong><\/p>\n

    ADNAN OKTAR DAVASI HAKKINDA BOZMA KARARI VEREN \u0130ST\u0130NAF HAK\u0130MLER\u0130N\u0130N HUKUK\u0130 GEREK\u00c7ELER\u0130<\/span><\/strong><\/h4>\n

    \u0130stinaf Hakimleri Yerel Mahkeme’nin ceza karar\u0131,<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6z ard\u0131 etti\u011fi (Bozma ilam\u0131, sf. 103, 1 05 , 1 09 , 141),<\/li>\n
    2. Cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131nda dini s\u00f6ylem ve telkinlerin iradeyi ortadan kald\u0131racak bir hile olarak kabul edilemeyece\u011fine dair Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 oldu\u011fu (Bozma \u0130lam\u0131, sf.108, sf. 109, Sf. 110),<\/li>\n
    3. \u0130radenin fesada u\u011frama iddias\u0131n\u0131n tek tek her bir m\u00fc\u015fteki kad\u0131n i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011fi, toptanc\u0131 bir yakla\u015f\u0131m oldu\u011fu (Bozma \u0130lam\u0131, sf. 109)<\/li>\n
    4. \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn \u201ckorkutucu\u201d g\u00fcc\u00fc oldu\u011funa dair karar\u0131n iddias\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin korkmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyen beyanlar\u0131na hi\u00e7 say\u0131larak verildi\u011fi (Bozma \u0130lam\u0131, sf. 44, 107, 204, 320, 324)<\/li>\n
    5. Karar\u0131n kendi i\u00e7inde \u00e7eli\u015fkili oldu\u011fu (Bozma ilam\u0131, sf. 140),<\/li>\n
    6. Cezalar\u0131 art\u0131rmak ad\u0131na haks\u0131z yere yanl\u0131\u015f yorumlar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bozma ilam\u0131, sf. 110, 337),<\/li>\n
    7. Eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bozma ilam\u0131, sf. 75, 305),<\/li>\n
    8. Uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini ve bilimsel m\u00fctalaalar\u0131 kasten g\u00f6z ard\u0131 etti\u011fi (Bozma ilam\u0131, sf. 304),<\/li>\n
    9. Savunma tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 bilerek dinlemedi\u011fi (Bozma ilam\u0131, sf.305),<\/li>\n
    10. M\u00fc\u015fteki ifadelerini \u00e7arp\u0131tt\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bozma ilam\u0131, sf. 327),<\/li>\n
    11. M\u00fc\u015fteki ifadelerindeki \u00e7eli\u015fkileri g\u00f6z ard\u0131 etti\u011fi (Bozma ilam\u0131, sf. 296, 323, 362, 365, 329),<\/li>\n
    12. Kanunun gere\u011fi olan teknik ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bozma ilam\u0131, sf. 347, 75, 119, 257),<\/li>\n
    13. Hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 beyanlar\u0131 h\u00fckme dayanak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bozma ilam\u0131, sf. 325)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

       gibi hakl\u0131 ve hukuki gerek\u00e7elerle bozmu\u015ftur. Bu karar\u0131 inceleyen her hukuk\u00e7u, hatta hen\u00fcz hukuk fak\u00fcltesi \u00f6\u011frencisi olanlar dahi, bu karar\u0131n hukuki kriterler esas al\u0131narak verildi\u011fini kolayl\u0131kla g\u00f6rebilir. <\/p>\n

      C\u0130NSEL SU\u00c7 \u0130SNATLARI A\u00c7ISINDAN BOZMA KARARI<\/span><\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\n

      \u0130stinaf\u0131n bozma karar\u0131nda \u00fczerinde \u00f6nemle durulan konu s\u00f6zde ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n iradelerinin fesada u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve s\u00f6zde \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn korkutucu bir y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn tespit edilmedi\u011fidir.<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

      M\u00fcvekkil ve san\u0131klar\u0131n tamam\u0131 da dosyada ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en hi\u00e7bir kad\u0131n ile gayri me\u015fru bir ili\u015fki i\u00e7inde olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, Allah\u2019\u0131n Kuran\u2019da bildirdi\u011fi haram ve helallere g\u00f6re ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, zinay\u0131 haram olarak kabul ettikleri i\u00e7in de s\u00f6zde ma\u011fdur kad\u0131nlar\u0131n anlatt\u0131klar\u0131 olaylar\u0131n hi\u00e7birinin ya\u015fanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 defalarca izah etmi\u015f, delillerle de ispat etmi\u015flerdir. <\/strong><\/p>\n

      \u0130stinaf Heyeti bu hususlar\u0131 kanunun tan\u0131m\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ve bilimsel g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerle somut olarak izah etmi\u015ftir. Dosyaya sunulmu\u015f olan bilimsel g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin de ortaya koydu\u011fu \u00fczere, \u201cTELK\u0130NLE K\u0130MSEN\u0130N \u0130RADES\u0130 VE D\u0130RENC\u0130N\u0130N YOK ED\u0130LEMEYECE\u011e\u0130\u201d bilimsel somut bir durum oldu\u011fundan Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7biri dini veya ba\u015fka telkini iradeyi ortadan kald\u0131ran unsur olarak g\u00f6rmemi\u015ftir.<\/strong> Bu konuda T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin t\u00fcm ceza hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131 da hemfikirdir. \u0130stinaf hakimleri de bilime, akla ve hukuka uygun bir de\u011ferlendirme yaparak DOSYANIN S\u00d6ZDE MA\u011eDURLARININ KEND\u0130 ARZU, \u0130STEK VE RIZALARIYLA HER \u015eEY\u0130 YA\u015eADIKLARINI, RIZA OLAN YERDE \u0130SE C\u0130NSEL SALDIRI SU\u00c7UNDAN BAHSED\u0130LEMEYECE\u011e\u0130N\u0130<\/strong> vurgulam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

      \n

      \u0130lgilinin r\u0131zas\u0131, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n \u201cHakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ilgilinin r\u0131zas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 26\/2. maddesinde; \u201cKi\u015finin \u00fczerinde mutlak surette tasarruf edebilece\u011fi bir hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin olmak \u00fczere, a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 r\u0131zas\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde i\u015flenen fiilden dolay\u0131 kimseye ceza verilmez.<\/strong>\u201d \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenleme ile bir hukuka uygunluk nedeni olarak say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hukuka uygunluk nedeni olan “ilgilinin r\u0131zas\u0131\u201dn\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in, r\u0131za a\u00e7\u0131klama ehliyetinin bulunmas\u0131,<\/strong> r\u0131zan\u0131n \u00fczerinde mutlak tasarruf edilebilir bir hukuki menfaate ili\u015fkin olmas\u0131 ve hukuken ge\u00e7erli bir r\u0131za a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131<\/strong> gerekmektedir. Temyiz kudretine sahip ki\u015finin mutlak surette tasarruf edebilece\u011fi bir hak \u00fczerinde, kanunun cevaz verdi\u011fi s\u0131n\u0131rlar i\u00e7erisinde, cebir, tehdit, hile veya iradeyi etkileyen ba\u015fka bir nedene dayal\u0131 olmadan, di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla irade fesad\u0131 olmadan verdi\u011fi r\u0131za, fiili, hukuka uygun hale getirir. Buna g\u00f6re; cinsel su\u00e7lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ilgilinin r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, <\/strong>a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fartlar\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak her somut olayda<\/u><\/strong>ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. <\/strong><\/p>\n

      Cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7unun tan\u0131m\u0131ndan da anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; cebir, \u015fiddet, tehdit ve hilenin ba\u015fl\u0131ca iradeyi etkileyen nedenler oldu\u011fu, s\u00f6zde dini s\u00f6ylem ve telkinlerin iradeyi ortadan kald\u0131rarak m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin fiile kar\u015f\u0131 koymalar\u0131n\u0131 olanaks\u0131zla\u015ft\u0131racak nitelikte bir hile boyutuna ula\u015fmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, hilenin kand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 ve iradeyi bozucu boyutta olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n her somut olayda y\u00f6neldi\u011fi ki\u015finin subjektif durumu, ya\u015f\u0131, zeka seviyesi, e\u011fitim durumu, ekonomik ve sosyal ko\u015fullar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak belirlenmesinin gerekti\u011fi, <\/u><\/strong>evlenme vaadi ile kar\u015f\u0131daki ki\u015fiyi ba\u015ftan \u00e7\u0131karmaya y\u00f6nelik bir tak\u0131m s\u00f6z ve davran\u0131\u015flarda bulunma \u015feklindeki eylemlerin hile olarak kabul edilemeyece\u011fi Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmektedir. (Bkz Yarg\u0131tay 14. Ceza Dairesi’nin 19.12.2016 tarihli 2016\/4887 esas 2016\/8588 karar say\u0131l\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay 14.Ceza Dairesi’nin 25.12.2019 tarihli 2018\/8754 esas 2019\/13601 karar say\u0131l\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay14. Ceza Dairesi’nin 11.02.2021 tarihli 2020\/326 esas 2021\/1125 K say\u0131l\u0131 ilamlar\u0131)<\/strong> <\/p>\n

      \u0130\u015fbu dosya kapsam\u0131nda her bir somut olay, her bir san\u0131k bak\u0131m\u0131ndan cinsel su\u00e7lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilirken, cebir, tehdit, hile veya iradeyi etkileyen ba\u015fka bir nedenin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n r\u0131zalar\u0131n\u0131n fiili hukuka uygun hale getirip getirmedi\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve gerek\u00e7elendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

      \u0130stinaf Bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n ilk b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yer alan bu a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n ard\u0131ndan her bir s\u00f6zde ma\u011fdur i\u00e7in bahse konu \u201cr\u0131zay\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131ran ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u201d olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tek tek, olay\u0131n vuku bulu\u015f \u015fekli, ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n kendi beyanlar\u0131, dosyaya sunulmu\u015f olan foto\u011fraf, yaz\u0131\u015fma, telefon tapeleri gibi deliller incelenerek ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 iddia ettikleri her \u015feyde r\u0131zalar\u0131 oldu\u011funa kanaat getirilmi\u015f ve bu somut duruma dayal\u0131 olarak C\u0130NSEL SALDIRI SU\u00c7LARININ NEREDEYSE TAMAMINDAN BERAAT KARARI VER\u0130LM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R. <\/strong><\/p>\n

      \u0130stinaf Heyeti, yerel mahkemenin bu konuda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuka t\u00fcm\u00fcyle ayk\u0131r\u0131 “toptanc\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme”nin aksine, her bir ma\u011fdur i\u00e7in durumu tek tek de\u011ferlendirerek s\u00f6zde ma\u011fdurlar i\u00e7in hukuki tespitlerde bulunmu\u015ftur. <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

      Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na g\u00f6re cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 tan\u0131mlayan kanunlara g\u00f6re bir eylemin su\u00e7 say\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in baz\u0131 olmazsa olmaz ko\u015fullar vard\u0131r. E\u011fer bu ko\u015fullar yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 yap\u0131lan vakalarda yoksa bu durumda cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131dan bahsetmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmaz. Bu ko\u015fullar\u0131n en ba\u015f\u0131nda ise; <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

    14. \u201cZor\u201d, \u201ctehdit\u201d, \u201cbask\u0131\u201d olmas\u0131, yani kad\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 olay\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131 olmadan, diren\u00e7 g\u00f6stermesine ra\u011fmen korku veya tehdit alt\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi,<\/u><\/strong><\/li>\n
    15. Ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 eylemin ne oldu\u011funu kavrayamayacak yani kar\u015f\u0131 durmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini bilemeyecek kadar iradesini yitirmi\u015f (\u00f6rne\u011fin ila\u00e7 ya da \u015fuur kayb\u0131na sebep olacak derecede alkol\u00fcn etkisi alt\u0131nda olmak gibi)<\/em><\/u><\/strong><\/li>\n
    16. Ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 eylemin ne oldu\u011funu anlayamayacak t\u00fcrden bir hile alt\u0131nda olmas\u0131. Hukuken neyin hile oldu\u011funun \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fc ise \u201ceylemin ne oldu\u011funu ve neye sebep oldu\u011funu kavramay\u0131 engellemesi\u201ddir. Bu durumda bir erke\u011fin bir kad\u0131n\u0131 evlenece\u011fim seninle diyerek cinsel ili\u015fkiye raz\u0131 etmesi hukuken hile olarak de\u011ferlendirilemez. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc kad\u0131n eylemin i\u00e7eri\u011finin ne oldu\u011funun ve neticesinin fark\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/u><\/strong><\/li>\n

      T\u00fcm bu bilgiler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkil ve arkada\u015flar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik isnatta bulunan kad\u0131nlar\u0131n hikayeleri incelendi\u011finde zor, bask\u0131 ve tehdit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, iradelerinin fesada u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve herhangi bir hileye de maruz kalmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyan y\u00fczlerce hukuki, hakl\u0131 ve somut delil vard\u0131r. \u0130stinaf heyetinin t\u00fcm ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n tek tek b\u00fct\u00fcn ifadelerini, savunma delillerini, dosyadaki m\u00fctalaalar\u0131 inceleyerek vard\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da sadece bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131ralad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z tespitlerinin her biri de g\u00fcya cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131 ortaya atan kad\u0131nlar\u0131n san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan hi\u00e7bir zaman herhangi bir tehdit, bask\u0131, zorlama, dayatmaya maruz kalmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, kad\u0131nlar\u0131n iradelerinin yerinde ve sa\u011flam oldu\u011funu, herhangi bir aldat\u0131lm\u0131\u015fl\u0131k da ya\u015famad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermektedir:<\/p>\n

      (M\u00fcvekkil ve di\u011fer san\u0131k arkada\u015flar\u0131, dosyan\u0131n s\u00f6zde ma\u011fdur kad\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n r\u0131zalar\u0131yla olsa dahi, onlarla Kuran’a g\u00f6re haram say\u0131lan herhangi bir cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131 da hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde kabul etmemekle birlikte)<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

      S\u00f6zde ma\u011fdur kad\u0131nlar\u0131n;<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. San\u0131kla duygusal ili\u015fki i\u00e7inde oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      2. S\u00f6zde cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u011f\u0131rma, g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn yetti\u011fi kadar bir \u015fiddetle kar\u015f\u0131 koyma, ka\u00e7maya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma gibi bir mukavemet sergilemedi\u011fini beyan etmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      3. \u00c7\u0131\u011fl\u0131k at\u0131p atmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 soruldu\u011funda \u201chay\u0131r\u201d yan\u0131t\u0131n\u0131 vermesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      4. San\u0131k odadan ayr\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen evden uzakla\u015fmay\u0131p yatakta durmaya devam etti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      5. Zorla ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini iddia etti\u011fi eylemlerden sonra san\u0131k banyoya girdi\u011finde evden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131p onu bekledi\u011fini anlatmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      6. San\u0131kla eylemler sonras\u0131 sevgililik ili\u015fkisini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmeye devam etti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      7. Bir hafta sonra tekrar g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ferek cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      8. (Zorla oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi eylem sonras\u0131) san\u0131kla banyoya girerek birlikte du\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlatmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      9. (Zorla oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi) beraberlik sonras\u0131 banyoya gidip gelmeyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131 merak edip ne oldu\u011funu sormak i\u00e7in yan\u0131na gitti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      10. \u0130ddia etti\u011fi eylemlerden sonra dahi san\u0131klarla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerine devam etmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      11. San\u0131klarla ayn\u0131 ortamda \u00e7ekincesiz bulunmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      12. Zorla oldu\u011funu iddia etmedi\u011fi ba\u015fkaca anal-oral ili\u015fkiler ya\u015famaya devam etti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      13. S\u00f6zde ma\u011fdurun san\u0131kla beraberliklerine devam etmeyi talep eden konumda olmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      14. San\u0131kla sonras\u0131nda zorla oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 cinsel birliktelikler ya\u015famaya devam etti\u011fini anlatmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      15. \u0130radesini fesada u\u011fratacak herhangi bir telkine maruz kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bizzat beyan etmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      16. San\u0131ktan ayr\u0131lmaya dahi kalk\u0131\u015fmamas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      17. \u0130ddia etti\u011fi eylemden sonra evden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131p ayn\u0131 evde san\u0131kla yemek yemesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      18. Evlilik olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlay\u0131nca ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair anlat\u0131m\u0131 ile o ana kadar ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc beraberlikte r\u0131zas\u0131 oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      19. Elinde telefonu varken, rahatl\u0131kla yard\u0131m isteyebilecekken yapmamas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      20. Kad\u0131n haklar\u0131 savunucusu oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyen kat\u0131lan\u0131n maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fiddet ve sald\u0131r\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131ndaki tepkisizli\u011fi, adli mercilere ba\u015fvurmamas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      21. Avukat olup, mesle\u011finin sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kolayl\u0131kla rahatl\u0131kla ula\u015fabilece\u011fi adli mercilere herhangi bir \u015fikayetinin olmamas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      22. \u0130stemedi\u011fi bir davran\u0131\u015fa katlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kendi beyanlar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      23. \u0130stemedi\u011fi bir ili\u015fkiye kar\u015f\u0131 gelme imkan\u0131 oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 (istemedi\u011fi zaman itiraz ederek ili\u015fki ya\u015famay\u0131 reddetti\u011fini ve bu konuda bask\u0131 ya da zorlama g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi),<\/strong><\/li>\n
      24. Kat\u0131lan\u0131n kendi beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re, istemedi\u011fi noktada eylemi sonland\u0131rmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      25. \u0130ddia edilen olay\u0131n kat\u0131lan\u0131n onay vermemesi \u00fczerine herhangi bir \u0131srar, dayatma, zorlama olmadan son bulmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      26. Kat\u0131lan\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirdi\u011fi andan itibaren eylemin son buldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesi, <\/strong><\/li>\n
      27. \u0130stismar olarak nitelendirdi\u011fi eylem sonras\u0131nda san\u0131kla AVM\u2019ye giderek sohbet edip yemek yemeleri, olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi evde san\u0131\u011fa poz vererek foto\u011fraf \u00e7ektirmesi, <\/strong><\/li>\n
      28. San\u0131\u011f\u0131 cezaevinde ziyaret etmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      29. San\u0131\u011fa cezaevinde sevgisini ifade eden \u00e7ok say\u0131da mektup yazmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      30. Zora dayal\u0131 bir anal birliktelik iddias\u0131nda bulunmu\u015f ise de, bu olaydan sonra evden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131p geceyi san\u0131kla ge\u00e7irdi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      31. Kat\u0131lan\u0131n okul gezisi \u00f6ncesinde birka\u00e7 saatlik bir bo\u015flukta yar\u0131m saatlik ara\u00e7 yolculu\u011fu ile gitti\u011fi evde 4 ayr\u0131 erke\u011fin zora dayal\u0131 istismar\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n ve \u00fcstelik akabinde geri d\u00f6nerek geziye gitmesinin hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      32. Kolluk ve duru\u015fma ifadeleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7eli\u015fkiler olmas\u0131, <\/strong><\/li>\n
      33. Kollukta ismen tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u015fiddet uygulayarak bir\u00e7ok kez sald\u0131r\u0131da bulundu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesine ra\u011fmen, do\u011frulu\u011fu halinde vahamet arz eden b\u00f6yle bir olay\u0131 mahkemede ifade verirken hat\u0131rlamamas\u0131, <\/strong><\/li>\n
      34. San\u0131klar\u0131n verdi\u011fi para ve hediyeleri \u00e7ekincesiz kabul etmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      35. \u0130ddia etti\u011fi taciz eylemlerinin ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 yere bile bile kendi iste\u011fiyle aylar, y\u0131llar boyunca gitmeye devam etmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      36. Ailesi ile ya\u015fay\u0131p, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yan\u0131na zorla gitti\u011fine dair bir iddian\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      37. Kolluk beyan\u0131nda r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi, <\/strong><\/li>\n
      38. Adli t\u0131p raporu bulunmamas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      39. Ortamda olan tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ki\u015filere kar\u015f\u0131 belirgin bir ho\u015fnutsuzluk sergilememesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      40. Uzun y\u0131llar boyunca s\u00f6z konusu ortamda bulunmaya devam etmesi,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      41. San\u0131klardan olu\u015fan grubun etkinliklerine aktif \u015fekilde kat\u0131lmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      42. \u0130lerleyen y\u0131llarda san\u0131klara yard\u0131m say\u0131lacak mahiyette faaliyetlerde bulunmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      43. Arkada\u015f\u0131yla olan mail yaz\u0131\u015fmas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      44. Whatsapp mesajlar\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      45. Foto\u011fraflar,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      46. Bizzat kendisinin sundu\u011fu mail i\u00e7erikleri,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      47. Etkin pi\u015fman san\u0131ktan \u015fikayetinden vazge\u00e7mesi, <\/strong><\/li>\n
      48. Kat\u0131lan\u0131n iddias\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulayacak mahiyette g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ve dijital materyale rastlanmamas\u0131,<\/strong><\/li>\n
      49. Tape kay\u0131t i\u00e7eriklerinde sevgi dolu do\u011fal konu\u015fmalar olmas\u0131, <\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        gibi somut durumlar kanunlar\u0131n belirledi\u011fi \u201ccinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7u\u201dnun bu dosyada ya\u015fanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u0130stinaf Heyetinin verdi\u011fi beraat ve bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n da do\u011fru ve hukuki bir karar oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermektedir. <\/strong><\/p>\n

        S\u00d6ZDE MA\u011eDURLARIN ADL\u0130 TIP RAPORLARININ OLMAMASI <\/span><\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\n

        T\u00fcm bu somut bulgular\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra yerel mahkemenin cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131nda olmazsa olmaz olarak kabul edilen Adli T\u0131p raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 san\u0131klar\u0131n t\u00fcm taleplerine ra\u011fmen kabul etmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 da \u0130stinaf\u0131n bozma karar\u0131ndaki konulardan biri olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

        Zira bahse konu s\u00f6zde fiillerin ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n\u0131n Adli T\u0131p Kurumu\u2019nda bedensel ve ruhsal y\u00f6nden muayene edilerek bunlar\u0131n beden ve ruh sa\u011fl\u0131klar\u0131nda bir bozulma olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 yap\u0131lmadan h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmesi kanunen m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. \u0130stinaf bozma karar\u0131nda da bu durum defaetle vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

        \n

        \u2026olay nedeniyle kat\u0131lan\u0131n ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bozulup bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 6. \u0130htisas Kurulundan usul\u00fcne uygun rapor ald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi<\/strong> g\u00f6zetilmeden eksik kovu\u015fturma ile h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi, Sf. 241<\/p>\n

        \u2026kat\u0131lan\u0131n beden veya ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bozulup bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda Adli T\u0131p Kurumu \u0130lgili \u0130htisas Kurulu veya Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Kanununun 7, 23 ve 31. maddeleri gere\u011fince usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde te\u015fekk\u00fcl ettirilmi\u015f Y\u00fcksek \u00d6\u011fretim Kurumlar\u0131ndan veya birimlerine ba\u011fl\u0131 hastanelerden rapor al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra,<\/strong> bu rapor neticesine g\u00f6re su\u00e7 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK ile 28.06.2014 tarihinde yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren ve cinsel dokunulmazl\u0131\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7larda de\u011fi\u015fiklik yapan 6545 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile getirilen d\u00fczenlemeler de g\u00f6zetilip ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 olaya uygulanarak lehe kanunun belirlenmesi gerekirken eksik kovu\u015fturma ile sf. 347<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

        Buna ra\u011fmen yerel mahkeme 15\/0\/2022 tarihli bozma ilam\u0131nda ifade edilen bu zorunlu i\u015flemi yerine getirmeden, yani kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak h\u00fck\u00fcm vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

        \u0130DD\u0130ANAMES\u0130 BULUNMAYAN EYLEMLER HAKKINDA CEZA KARARI VER\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u0130\u00c7\u0130N BOZMA KARARI VER\u0130LM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R<\/span><\/u><\/strong><\/h4>\n

        \u0130stinaf\u0131n Bozma Karar\u0131n\u0131n 91. ve 92. sayfalar\u0131nda 19 eylem tek tek say\u0131larak bu eylemlerle ilgili a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir dava bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015f ve bu durum bozma nedeni say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130stinaf\u0131n bu tespitinin ard\u0131ndan Yerel Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken s\u00f6z konusu 19 eylem isnad\u0131yla ilgili ek iddianame d\u00fczenlenmesi ve hukuki eksikli\u011fin giderilmesidir. Ancak yerel mahkeme bu en temel gereklili\u011fi bile yerine getirme ihtiyac\u0131 duymam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. M\u00fcvekkil Adnan Oktar ve san\u0131klar, haklar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f dava bulunmayan toplam 19 fiille ilgili iddianamesiz \u015fekilde yarg\u0131lanm\u0131\u015f ve olmayan iddianamelerle olmayan davalarla haklar\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

        Sayg\u0131lar\u0131m\u0131zla kamuoyunun bilgisine sunar\u0131z. 25.11.2024<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        \u0130ST\u0130NAF MAHKEMES\u0130 BOZMA KARARINI 14 AY BOYUNCA DOSYAYI \u0130NCELEY\u0130P, TEK TEK KANUNLARLA ve YARGITAY \u0130\u00c7T\u0130HATLARIYLA DEL\u0130LLEND\u0130REREK VERM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R -1. B\u00f6l\u00fcm- M\u00fcvekkil Adnan Oktar ve di\u011fer yarg\u0131lananlar hakk\u0131nda yerel mahkemenin vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu hukuksuz ceza kararlar\u0131n\u0131 hukuki ve kanuni gerek\u00e7elerle bozan \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi Hakimlerinin s\u0131rf hukukun gere\u011fini yapt\u0131klar\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genel"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}