{"id":1,"date":"2024-06-28T07:06:00","date_gmt":"2024-06-28T07:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tumgercekler.net\/index.php\/2024\/06\/28\/2024-06-yarglama-surecinde-yaplan-cok-fazla\/"},"modified":"2024-06-28T07:06:00","modified_gmt":"2024-06-28T07:06:00","slug":"2024-06-yarglama-surecinde-yaplan-cok-fazla","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/2024\/06\/28\/2024-06-yarglama-surecinde-yaplan-cok-fazla\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131lama S\u00fcrecinde Yap\u0131lan \u00c7ok Fazla Say\u0131daki Hak \u0130hlalleri Konusunda Sunumumuz"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/div>\n

Adnan Oktar \u0130stanbul 30. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nde yarg\u0131lanm\u0131\u015f ve 11.01.2021 Tarih, 2019\/313 E., 2021\/6 K. say\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar ile \u00e7e\u015fitli hapis cezalar\u0131na hu\u0308kmedilmi\u015ftir. Bu yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde \u00e7ok fazla say\u0131da hak ihlali<\/strong> ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini ve Adnan Oktar\u2019\u0131n savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n pek \u00e7ok vesile ile ihlal edildi\u011fini <\/strong>\u00e7e\u015fitli tarihli dilek\u00e7eler ile dosyaya sunmu\u015ftuk.<\/p>\n

Ayn\u0131 yarg\u0131lamada ayn\u0131 nitelikte hak ihlallerine maruz kalan ba\u015fkaca san\u0131klar\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u015fvurular karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f ve Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan huzurdaki ba\u015fvuruya konu olan yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde san\u0131klar\u0131n maruz kald\u0131klar\u0131 hak ihlalleri tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi, gerek 14.12.2023 Tarih ve 2020\/25125 Ba\u015fvuru No\u2019lu karar\u0131 ve, 14.12.2023 Tarih ve 2021\/11929 Ba\u015fvuru No\u2019lu karar\u0131 ile, huzurdaki ba\u015fvuruya konu yarg\u0131lamada<\/strong>san\u0131klar\u0131n ANAYASA\u2019NIN 36. MADDES\u0130NDE G\u00dcVENCE ALTINA ALINAN AD\u0130L YARGILANMA HAKLARININ \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE<\/u> h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. <\/strong><\/p>\n

 Dosyada etkin pi\u015fman san\u0131k olarak yarg\u0131lanan Burak Abac\u0131, Emre Teker, Mehmet Muratdevlio\u011flu, Ali \u015eeref Gider, Murat Terko\u011flu, Mustafa Arular, Kemal Ayaz taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru sonucunda, Anayasa Mahkemesi, 6. sayfa 29. maddede \u201cikinci olarak\u201d diye ba\u015flayan c\u00fcmle ile birlikte, san\u0131klar\u0131n yarg\u0131land\u0131klar\u0131 davada ne \u015fekilde hak ihlallerine maruz b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 detayl\u0131 \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klanmaktad\u0131r:<\/p>\n

“… \u0130kinci olarak, yarg\u0131lamalarda san\u0131klar\u0131n delil toplatma ve inceletme talepleri silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak reddedilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucular iddia makam\u0131na nazaran dezavantajl\u0131 bir konuma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucular bir\u00e7ok usule ili\u015fkin imkandan yararland\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Teknik bilgi gerektiren ve uzmanl\u0131k isteyen konularda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n talepleri yetersiz gerek\u00e7elerle reddedilmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli kararlarda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikteki iddialar\u0131 ve savunmalar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/strong><\/div>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin ilgili karar\u0131nda, CMK m.289\/1-g ile m.289\/1-h h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re hukuka kesin ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k hallerinin var oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015f olmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Nitekim, Adnan Oktar ad\u0131na sunmu\u015f oldu\u011fumuz pek \u00e7ok dilek\u00e7e ile bu durum m\u00fcteaddit defalar izah edilmi\u015f olup, say\u0131n Dairenize iletilmek \u00fczere \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi\u2019ne sunmu\u015f oldu\u011fumuz 1897 sayfal\u0131k temyiz dilek\u00e7emizde;<\/p>\n

    \n
  • sayfada \u201cMahkeme Heyeti san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nan bilimsel m\u00fctalaalar\u0131 mahkeme huzurunda tart\u0131\u015fmam\u0131\u015f ve karar\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmeye almam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda,<\/li>\n
  • sayfada \u201cCMK 289\/1-a,d,e,g,h,i maddeleri uyar\u0131nca hukuka kesin ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k halleri davam\u0131z bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olu\u015fmu\u015ftur\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda,<\/li>\n
  • sayfada \u201cCMK m.289\/1-g bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda,<\/li>\n
  • sayfada \u201cCMK m.289\/1-h bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda,<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan tespit edilmi\u015f olan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ihlalleri detayl\u0131ca a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Temyiz dilek\u00e7emizde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a delillendirdi\u011fimiz \u00fczere;<\/p>\n

    Mu\u0308vekkil ve onunla birlikte yakla\u015f\u0131k 250 san\u0131k, 2019 \u2013 2021 aras\u0131nda yu\u0308ru\u0308tu\u0308len bozma \u00f6ncesi kovu\u015fturma su\u0308recinde H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R M\u00dc\u015eTEK\u0130, H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R TANIK, H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R ETK\u0130N P\u0130\u015eMAN SANIK ile, 2022\u2019de bozma sonras\u0131 yu\u0308ru\u0308tu\u0308len 2. kovu\u015fturma su\u0308recinde ise (iki \u00f6zel harekat polisi haricinde) H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R M\u00dc\u015eTEK\u0130, (ikisi hari\u00e7) H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R TANIK ve (sonradan etkin pi\u015fman olan u\u0308\u00e7 ki\u015fi haricinde) H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R ETK\u0130N P\u0130\u015eMAN SANIK \u0130LE Y\u00dcZLE\u015eMEDEN, SORU SORMA HAKKINI KULLANAMADAN YARGILANMI\u015eTIR.<\/p>\n

    \u0130lk kovu\u015fturma su\u0308recinde 236 san\u0131k ve mu\u0308dafilerinin, ikinci kovu\u015fturma su\u0308recinde 215 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve mu\u0308dafilerinin talep etti\u011fi usul ve yasaya uygun TEVS\u0130 TAHK\u0130KAT TALEB\u0130NDEN TEK B\u0130R TANES\u0130 B\u0130LE<\/u> MAHKEMELERCE KABUL ED\u0130LMEM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R<\/strong>. Yarg\u0131lanan 215 san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafiinin tek bir tanesinin bile gerekli ve hukuka uygun tevsi tahkikat talebinde bulunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermenin, makul olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    2016 y\u0131l\u0131nda soru\u015fturmaya ba\u015flan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan,<\/p>\n

    2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda polis operasyonu ile birlikte 236 ki\u015finin g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bunlar\u0131n bu\u0308yu\u0308k \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

    2019 y\u0131l\u0131 Eylu\u0308l ay\u0131nda yarg\u0131laman\u0131n ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

    2021 y\u0131l\u0131 Ocak ay\u0131nda ceza hu\u0308ku\u0308mlerinin a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

    2022 y\u0131l\u0131 Mart ay\u0131nda B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi (bundan b\u00f6yle BAM 1CD olarak an\u0131lacakt\u0131r) taraf\u0131ndan bozularak yerel mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilen,<\/p>\n

    2022 y\u0131l\u0131 Eylu\u0308l ay\u0131nda bozma sonras\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

    2022 y\u0131l\u0131 Kas\u0131m ay\u0131nda ise bozma sonras\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada yeniden ceza hu\u0308ku\u0308mlerinin a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava su\u0308recinde, hi\u00e7bir san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve mu\u0308dafilerinin SAVUNMA TANI\u011eI D\u0130NLENMEDEN YARGILAMA Y\u00dcR\u00dcT\u00dcLM\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcR. Hatta mahkeme salonunun kap\u0131s\u0131na kadar getirilip haz\u0131r edilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n da hi\u00e7birisi, CMK m.178\u2019e ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacak \u015fekilde, dinlenmemi\u015ftir. Bu boyutta bir dosyada, y\u0131llara yay\u0131lan bir yarg\u0131lama boyunca san\u0131klar\u0131n, lehine delil toplama ve tan\u0131k dinletme haklar\u0131 hi\u00e7bir zaman kulland\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    A\u00c7IKTIR K\u0130, 215 SANI\u011eIN VE M\u00dcDAF\u0130LER\u0130N\u0130N \u00c7A\u011eIRILMASINI TALEP ETT\u0130KLER\u0130 SAVUNMA TANIKLARININ ARASINDAN TEK B\u0130R\u0130N\u0130N B\u0130LE MADD\u0130 HAK\u0130KAT\u0130N ORTAYA \u00c7IKARILMASINA KATKISI BULUNMAYACA\u011eINI KABUL ETMEK M\u00dcMK\u00dcN DE\u011e\u0130LD\u0130R.<\/p>\n

    3968 sayfal\u0131k iddianamesi \u0130stanbul 30. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmi\u015f olan, 11.01.2021 tarihli ve 2019\/313 Esas, 2021\/6 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli kararda san\u0131klara binlerce y\u0131ll\u0131k hapis cezalar\u0131na hu\u0308kmedilmi\u015f ve bu kararlar\u0131n neredeyse tamam\u0131na yak\u0131n\u0131 BAM 1CD taraf\u0131ndan savunmalar ve somut deliller de de\u011ferlendirilerek, hukuka uygun ve isabetli gerek\u00e7elerle bozulmu\u015f olup bozma sonras\u0131 yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan \u0130stanbul 30 ACM heyeti taraf\u0131ndan istinaf karar\u0131 \u201cyok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde(!)\u201d kabul edilerek TCK m.220\/2-3 isnad\u0131yla tutuksuz yarg\u0131lanan san\u0131klar\u0131n savunma su\u0308resi SADECE 15 DAK\u0130KA, tutuklu yarg\u0131lanan san\u0131klar\u0131n savunma su\u0308resi SADECE 30 DAK\u0130KA olarak tayin edilmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131lama sonucu 8 bin 658 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 verilen, kurucu ve y\u00f6netici olmakla yarg\u0131lanan san\u0131klar\u0131n kullanabildi\u011fi maksimum savunma su\u0308resi 1 saat kadard\u0131r. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, TCK m.220\/2-3 isnad\u0131yla yarg\u0131lanan etkin pi\u015fman san\u0131k Mu\u0308ge \u00d6\u011fu\u0308t\u00e7u\u0308\u2019ye yakla\u015f\u0131k 6 saat su\u0308re ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    Sonu\u00e7 olarak;<\/p>\n

    Taraf\u0131m\u0131zca Adnan Oktar ad\u0131na sunulmu\u015f olan temyiz dilek\u00e7emizde delillendirdi\u011fimiz, ayr\u0131ca ayn\u0131 davan\u0131n ba\u015fkaca pek \u00e7ok san\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da defalarca sunulmu\u015f olan dilek\u00e7elerde de ortaya konulmu\u015f olan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ihlalleri konusunda, Anayasa Mahkemesi ilgili kararlar\u0131yla bahsetti\u011fimiz hak ihlallerini tespit etmi\u015ftir. Bu tespitlerin do\u011fal hukuki neticesi olarak \u0130stanbul 30. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131nda hak ihlalleri tespit edilen san\u0131klar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeniden dosya numaras\u0131 vermi\u015f ve yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n\u0131n yenilenmesine ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, ayn\u0131 davada yarg\u0131lanm\u0131\u015f olup ayn\u0131 hak ihlallerine maruz b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan Adnan Oktar ve di\u011fer t\u00fcm san\u0131klar\u0131n da ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle de\u011ferlendirilerek temyize konu ceza h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi kanaatindeyiz.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Adnan Oktar \u0130stanbul 30. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nde yarg\u0131lanm\u0131\u015f ve 11.01.2021 Tarih, 2019\/313 E., 2021\/6 K. say\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar ile \u00e7e\u015fitli hapis cezalar\u0131na hu\u0308kmedilmi\u015ftir. Bu yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde \u00e7ok fazla say\u0131da hak ihlali ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini ve Adnan Oktar\u2019\u0131n savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n pek \u00e7ok vesile ile ihlal edildi\u011fini \u00e7e\u015fitli tarihli […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genel"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gercekler.dijitalhukuk.site\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}